The fact that I get called a Zionist, MOSSAD puppet, or a Jew for saying that Israel isn't useful anymore...
It goes to show just how well the power structure in the United States can conduct its foreign policy by pretending to be under the control of some all-powerful cabal.
One of two very clear, distinguishable outcomes will become clear in the near future.
1. Assuming it's Israel controlling America, which many people entertain the idea, means that Israel will ascend to achieve Greater Israel no matter the cost to the United States and will force it to be the primary force in Gaza doing all of the work. This will wipe Gaza off the map and the new boundaries of Greater Israel will be established, thus pushing the region towards WW3 escalation. This has not happened in spite of a return into Gaza.
2. The paradigm that I agree with, the thesis that America controls Israel, is one that I've been saying on here since I started posting a few months back. We will see the continuation of progress towards the establishment of Palestinian statehood and the continued decoupling of America and Israel. Israel and Zionism just aren't useful to anyone anymore and that includes the last remaining benefactor, the military industrial complex. It's bad for all other business interests and it stalls the transition of the global economy to the Middle East and global south.
This is a post that I want people to bookmark.
At the of the day, there is only one dog tied to a leash and who will be held accountable.
Remember what Henry Kissinger infamously said...
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."
The fact that I get called a Zionist, MOSSAD puppet, or a Jew for saying that Israel isn't useful anymore...
It goes to show just how well the power structure in the United States can conduct its foreign policy by pretending to be under the control of some all-powerful cabal.
One of two very clear, distinguishable outcomes will become clear in the near future.
1. Assuming it's Israel controlling America, which many people entertain the idea, means that Israel will ascend to achieve Greater Israel no matter the cost to the United States and will force it to be the primary force in Gaza doing all of the work. This will wipe Gaza off the map and the new boundaries of Greater Israel will be established, thus pushing the region towards WW3 escalation. This has not happened in spite of a return into Gaza.
2. The paradigm that I agree with, the thesis that America controls Israel, is one that I've been saying on here since I started posting a few months back. We will see the continuation of progress towards the establishment of Palestinian statehood and the continued decoupling of America and Israel. Israel and Zionism just aren't useful to anyone anymore and that includes the last remaining benefactor, the military industrial complex. It's bad for all other business interests and it stalls the transition of the global economy to the Middle East and global south.
This is a post that I want people to bookmark.
At the of the day, there is only one dog tied to a leash and who will be held accountable.
Remember what Henry Kissinger infamously said...
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."
BY đź“Š Politically Incorrect Polls
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.
Should You Buy Bitcoin?
In general, many financial experts support their clients’ desire to buy cryptocurrency, but they don’t recommend it unless clients express interest. “The biggest concern for us is if someone wants to invest in crypto and the investment they choose doesn’t do well, and then all of a sudden they can’t send their kids to college,” says Ian Harvey, a certified financial planner (CFP) in New York City. “Then it wasn’t worth the risk.” The speculative nature of cryptocurrency leads some planners to recommend it for clients’ “side” investments. “Some call it a Vegas account,” says Scott Hammel, a CFP in Dallas. “Let’s keep this away from our real long-term perspective, make sure it doesn’t become too large a portion of your portfolio.” In a very real sense, Bitcoin is like a single stock, and advisors wouldn’t recommend putting a sizable part of your portfolio into any one company. At most, planners suggest putting no more than 1% to 10% into Bitcoin if you’re passionate about it. “If it was one stock, you would never allocate any significant portion of your portfolio to it,” Hammel says.
